Introduction des compétences informationnelles dans un cours universitaire

avantages et enjeux d’une pratique innovante

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.33137/cjal-rcbu.v9.41078

Keywords:

academic librarians, digital literacy, information literacy skills, surveys, undergraduate teaching

Abstract

For several years now, the librarians at Université de Moncton have been teaching the Information Literacy / Library Research component as part of a mandatory introductory course offered to all first-year students in several faculties. As part of a study conducted in collaboration with the CompeTI.CA Partnership Network in 2016-2019, we collected and analyzed the perceptions of students participating in the course, as well as the observations and recommendations of librarians teaching it.

Using a qualitative and inductive grounded theory methodology adopted by the Network and based on an inclusive and collaborative approach has allowed us to generate research data and practical recommendations. The conclusions derive from the analysis of the data collected, rather than from predetermined theories. Results suggest that this model of teaching information literacy as part of a course and its learning objectives seems to benefit students and contribute to their academic success. Optimization of the pedagogical structure of the course, placement tests, as well as the importance of a gradual and adapted approach to developing the information literacy skills are some of recommendations that emerge from this study.

By publishing this article, we wish to make a modest contribution to the French-language scientific literature about the acquisition of information literacy skills by first-year university students, as well as the role of academic librarians in the teaching mission of post-secondary institutions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Victoria Volkanova, Université de Moncton

Victoria Volkanova travaille comme bibliothécaire à l’Université de Moncton depuis 2005. Elle est rattachée à la Faculté des sciences, à la Faculté des études supérieures et de la recherche, responsable du dossier de la communication savante, ainsi que coordonnatrice du site web de la Bibliothèque Champlain.  Ses intérêts de recherche touchent l’éducation et la science ouvertes, le libre accès à la recherche, la communication savante, et les compétences informationnelles.

Viktor Freiman, Université de Moncton

Viktor Freiman est professeur au Département d'enseignement au primaire et de psychopédagogie à l’Université de Moncton, didacticien des mathématiques et des TIC. Il s’intéresse aux pratiques éducatives innovantes visant le développement du plein potentiel de chaque élève, à la résolution de problèmes dans un environnement virtuel et au développement de compétences numériques.

References

Aharony, Noa, Julien, Heidi et Noa Nadel-Kritz. 2020. « Survey of information literacy instructional practices in academic libraries ». Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 52 (4) : 964–971. doi.org/10.1177/0961000619891762.

Basilotta-Gómez-Pablos, Veronica, Matarranz, Maria, Casado-Aranda, Luis-Alberto et Ana Otto. 2022. « Teachers’ digital competencies in higher education: a systematic literature review ». International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education 19 (8). doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00312-8.

Blayone, Todd, Mykhailenko, Olena, VanOostveen, Roland, Grebeshkov, Oleksiy, Hrebeshkova, Olena et Oleksandr Vostryakov. 2017. « Surveying digital competencies of university students and professors in Ukraine for fully online collaborative learning ». Technology, Pedagogy and Education 27 (3) : 279–296. doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2017.1391871.

Calvani, Antonio, Maria Ranieri et Antonio Fini. 2009. « Assessing Students’ Digital Competence in School. » Dans Proceedings of E-Learn 2009—World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education. Sous la direction de T. Bastiaens, J. Dron et C. Xin, 852-859. Vancouver, Canada: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/32565/.

Codet, Florence, Desrues, Clemence, Grandmougin, Anne-Cécile et Goran Sekulovski. 2020. « Le SCD Paris-8 et l’E-inclusion : Vers une émancipation numérique ». Bulletin des bibliothèques de France 2. https://bbf.enssib.fr/consulter/BBF-2020-2_Codet-et-al.pdf.

Chodock, Ted et Elizabeth Dolinger. 2009. « Applying Universal Design to Information

Literacy: Teaching Students Who Learn Differently at Landmark College ». Reference & User Services Quarterly 49 (1) : 24–32. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20865172.

Conseil de recherche en sciences humaines (CRSH). 2010. Économie numérique : Acquérir les compétences numériques de demain. https://www.sshrc-crsh.gc.ca/home-accueil-fra.aspx

Courcelles, Michel, Papin, Dominique, Séguin, Catherine, Langevin Harnois, Félix et Ève-Lyne Rondeau. 2020. « Portrait des compétences informationnelles des étudiants du réseau de l’Université du Québec : résultats d’enquête ». Documentation et bibliothèques 66 (3) : 5–15. doi.org/10.7202/1071197ar.

Eva, Nicole et Sandra Cowan. 2015. « Information literacy as an essential component of liberal education ». https://hdl.handle.net/10133/3810.

Gapski, Harald. 2007. « Some Reflections on Digital Literacy ». Proceedings of the 3rd International Workshop on Digital Literacy, 49-55. https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-310/paper05.pdf.

Godin, Jeanne, Michel Léger, Manon LeBlanc et Viktor Freiman. 2020. « Moving forward: Lessons learned from a collaboration network aimed at developing digital skills in New Brunswick ». Communication présentée au AERA2020 Annual Meeting. The Power and Possibilities for the Public Good. San Francisco, CA. April 17-21, 2020. www.aera.net/Events-Meetings/Annual-Meeting/Previous-Annual-Meetings/2020-Annual-Meeting.

Groupe de travail sur la Promotion du développement des compétences informationnelles [GT-PDCI]. 2016. Référentiel de compétences informationnelles en enseignement supérieur. Traduction française du Framework for Information Literacy for Higher

Education de l’Association of College & Research Libraries (ACRL, 2015). Québec, QC : Université du Québec. https://ptc.uquebec.ca/pdci/system/files/documents/administration/referentiel_acrl_2016-vf_0.pdf.

HabiloMédias. 2016. Fondements de la littératie numérique. https://habilomedias.ca

Hosier, Allison. 2015. « Teaching Information Literacy Through ‘Un-Research’ ». Communications in Information Literacy 9 (2) : 126-135. doi.org/10.15760/comminfolit.2015.9.2.189.

Lecea, Marisha et Maria A. Perez-Stable. 2019. « Success of reiterative instruction: Looking at faculty-librarian collaboration to improve information literacy in political science education ». College & Undergraduate Libraries 26 (1) : 35-51. doi.org/10.1080/10691316.2019.1575305.

Lechtenberg, Ursula et Carrie Donovan. 2022. « Undoing Our Instructional Past: Envisioning New Models for Information Literacy ». College and Research Libraries 83 (5) : 837-840. doi.org/10.5860/crl.83.5.837.

Liu, Guoying. 2021. « Information literacy instruction for international graduate engineering students: A case study at University of Windsor ». Journal of Academic Librarianship 47 (5). doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2021.102415.

Orunsolu, Abdul, Olufunke Rebecca Vincent, Felix Adebayo et Oluwaseun Bamgboye. 2010. « Collaborative research: A synergistic approach to socio-economic development. » Dans Proceedings of Informing Science & IT Education Conference (InSITE) 2010, 10 : 551-559. https://www.informingscience.org/Publications/1273.

Paillé, Pierre. 1994. « L’analyse par théorisation ancrée ». Cahiers de recherche sociologique (23) : 147–181. doi.org/10.7202/1002253ar.

Parry, David, Jon Salsberg, et Ann C. Macaulay. 2009. Guide sur la collaboration entre les chercheurs et les utilisateurs des connaissances dans la recherche en santé. Ottawa: Instituts de recherche en santé du Canada. https://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/f/44954.html

Perruso, Carol. 2016. « Undergraduates’ Use of Google vs. Library Resources: A Four-Year Cohort Study ». College & Research Libraries 77 (5) : 614-630. doi.org/10.5860/crl.77.5.614.

Price, Elizabeth et Rebecca Richardson. 2015. « Integrating the thematic approach into information literacy courses ». Reference Services Review 43 (1) : 125-136. https://doi.org/10.1108/RSR-12-2014-0059.

Purnell, Margaret, Royal, Bernadette et Lyndall Wharton. 2020. « Supporting the development of information literacy skills and knowledge in undergraduate nursing students: An integrative review ». Nurse Education Today 95. doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2020.104585 .

Rae, Sandy et Margaret Hunn. 2015. « Assessing the Impact of Embedding Online Academic and Information Literacy Resources into a First Year Business Course ». Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 10 (4) : 95-112. doi.org/10.18438/B80C76.

Rath, Logan. 2022. « Factors that influence librarian definitions of information literacy ». The Journal of Academic Librarianship 48 (6). doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2022.102597

Sullo, Elaine. 2016. « Engineering Faculty Indicate High Levels of Awareness and Use of the Library But Tend to Consult Google and Google Scholar First for Research Resources ». Evidence-Based Library and Information Practice 11 (3) : 102-4. https://doi.org/10.18438/B84K98.

Tewell, Eamon. 2015. « A Decade of Critical Information Literacy: A Review of the Literature ». Communications in Information Literacy 9 (1) : 24-43. 10.15760/comminfolit.2015.9.1.174 .

UNESCO. 2022. « Programme Information pour tous ». www.unesco.org/fr/ifap/information-literacy.

Downloads

Published

2023-12-19

How to Cite

Volkanova, Victoria, and Viktor Freiman. 2023. “Introduction Des compétences Informationnelles Dans Un Cours Universitaire: Avantages Et Enjeux d’une Pratique Innovante”. Canadian Journal of Academic Librarianship 9 (December):1-23. https://doi.org/10.33137/cjal-rcbu.v9.41078.

Issue

Section

Special Focus on The Place of Teaching in Academic Librarians’ Work