Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The Role of Signature Strengths in Treatment Outcome: Initial Results from a Large and Diverse University Sample

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Character strengths are basic psychological ingredients that enable us to act in ways that enhance our well-being and life satisfaction. Despite research linking strength-based behavior to psychological health, few studies have examined their role within treatment. This study utilized a large and diverse sample of treatment-seeking university students to examine three specific questions: 1) what are the relationships between character strengths and symptom, social role, and interpersonal relationship impairment at intake? 2) do character strengths predict treatment outcome? 3) do signature strengths predict number of sessions completed? Participants completed a measure of strengths at intake and an outcome-based measure at intake and at every subsequent psychotherapy session. Results demonstrated the importance of Zest in relation to all subscales, being an excellerator of treatment progress and associated with better and faster treatment outcome and completion. Other findings of note include the protective factor of Love of Learning in this population, the paradoxical relationship between outcome and Persistence, Justice and Perseverance as overall predictors of better outcomes, and Hope as a predictor of less sessions completed. Clinical and research implications are discussed throughout.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Blanchard, T., McGrath, R. E., & Jayawickreme, E. (2021). Resilience in the face of interpersonal loss: The role of character strengths. Manuscript submitted for publication.

  • Bolier, L., Haverman, M., Westerhof, G., Riper, H., Smit, F., & Bohlmeijer, E. (2013). Positive psychology interventions: A meta- analysis of randomized controlled studies. BMC Public Health, 13, 119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakhssi, F., Kraiss, J. T., Sommers-Spijkerman, M., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2018). The effect of positive psychology interventions on well-being and distress in clinical samples with psychiatric or somatic disorders: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Psychiatry, 18(1), 211.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheavens, J. S., Feldman, D. B., Gum, A., Michael, S. T., & Snyder, C. R. (2006). Hope therapy in a community sample: A pilot investigation. Social Indicators Research, 77, 61–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freidlin, P., Littman-Ovadia, H., & Niemiec, R. M. (2017). Positive psychopathology: Social anxiety via character strengths underuse and overuse. Personality and Individual Differences, 108, 50–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.12.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gander, F., Proyer, R., Ruch, W., & Wyss, T. (2013). Strength- based positive interventions: Further evidence for their potential in enhancing well- being and alleviating depression. Journal of Happiness Studies, 14(4), 1241–1259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghielen, S. T. S., van Woerkom, M., & Christina Meyers, M. (2018). Promoting positive outcomes through strengths interventions: A literature review. Journal of Positive Psychology, 13(6), 573–585. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2017.1365164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall-Simmonds, A., & McGrath, R. E. (2019). Character strengths and clinical presentation. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 14(1), 51–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jayawickreme, E., & Blackie, L. E. R. (2019). Psychopathology and languishing are distinct. Journal of Positive Psychology, 14(1), 68–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert, M. J., Gregersen, A. T., & Burlingame, G. M. (2004). The Outcome Questionnaire-45. In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), 3rd ed.; The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment: Instruments for adults (Volume 3, 3rd ed.) (3rd ed. ed., pp. 191–234, Chapter xx, 1008 Pages). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers, Mahwah, NJ.

  • Lambert, M. J. (2013). Administration and scoring manual for the OQ-45. OQ Measures, LLC, Salt Lake City, UT.

  • Martinez-Marti, M. L., & Ruch, W. (2014). Character strengths and well- being across the life span: Data from a representative sample of German- speaking adults living in Switzerland. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1253.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mongrain, M., & Anselmo- Matthews, T. (2012). Do positive psychology exercises work? A replication of Seligman et al. (2005). Journal of Clinical Psychology, 68, 382– 389.

  • Niemiec, R. M. (2018). Character strengths interventions: A field guide for practitioners. Hogrefe Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Odou, N., & Vella- Brodrick, D. A. (2013). The efficacy of positive psychology interventions to increase well- being and the role of mental imagery ability. Social Indicators Research, 110(1), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9919-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press and Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  • Peterson, C. (2006). Strengths of character and happiness: Introduction to special issue. Journal of Happiness Studies, 7(3), 289–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan, D. M., Swain, N., Cameron, C., & Vella- Brodrick, D. A. (2015). How “other people matter” in a classroom- based strengths intervention: Exploring interpersonal strategies and classroom outcomes. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 10(1), 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rashid, T., Anjum, A., Lennex, C., Quinlin, D., Niemiec, R., Mayerson, D., & Kazemi, F. (2013). In C. Proctor & A. Linley (Eds.), Research, applications, and interventions for children and adolescents: A positive psychology perspective. Springer.

  • Rashid, T., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2018). Positive Psychotherapy: Clinician Manual. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, R. M., Weinstein, N., Berstein, J., Brown, K. W., Mistretta, L., & Gagne, M. (2010). Vitalizing effects of being outdoors and in nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30, 159–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schotanus-Dijkstra, M., Drossaert, C. H., Pieterse, M. E., Walburg, J. A., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2015). Efficacy of a multicomponent positive psychology self- help intervention: Study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. JMIR Research Protocols, 4(3), e105.

  • Schutte, N. S., & Malouff, J. M. (2019). The impact of signature character strengths interventions: A meta-analysis. Journal of Happiness Studies, 20(4), 1179–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A visionary new understanding of happiness and well-being. Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seligman, M. E., Steen, T. A., Park, N., & Peterson, C. (2005). Positive psychology progress: Empirical validation of interventions. American Psychologist, 60, 410–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winslow, C. J., Kaplan, S. A., Bradley- Geist, J., Lindsey, A. P., Ahmad, A. S., & Hargrove, A. K. (2016). An examination of two positive organizational interventions: For whom do these interventions work? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(2), 129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yan, T., Chan, C. W. H., Chow, K. M., Zheng, W., & Sun, M. (2020). A systematic review of the effects of character strengths-based intervention on the psychological well-being of patients suffering from chronic illnesses. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 76(7), 1567–1580. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.14356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

    Amanda A. Uliaszek, Tayyab Rashid & Zachary Zarowsky

Authors
  1. Amanda A. Uliaszek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tayyab Rashid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zachary Zarowsky
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda A. Uliaszek.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 27 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Uliaszek, A.A., Rashid, T. & Zarowsky, Z. The Role of Signature Strengths in Treatment Outcome: Initial Results from a Large and Diverse University Sample. J Contemp Psychother 52, 15–21 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-021-09523-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10879-021-09523-6

Search

Navigation