Values like peace and the absence of violence cannot be effectively taught. They must be practiced, embodied, and lived…We can agree that peace is fine and beautiful and that violence is nasty and ugly, but these characteristics are weak and unconvincing unless they are woven into the justificational fabric.
Matthew Lipman, P4C co-founder (2003, pp. 121, 114)
Abstract
This article explores how the philosophy for children (P4C) pedagogical model might be well positioned to support the educational strategies associated with the prevention of violent extremism, through early intervention in children’s concept development. Specifically, it considers how the stereotyping of concepts risks interfering with children’s reasoning by engendering relationally problematic views that skew what they might consider valuable, resulting in epistemic rigidity and reduced opportunities to practice responsible autonomy. In response to such risks, the article proposes promising avenues for P4C facilitation, with an aim to cultivate flexible thinking in children and thereby support their evolving competence as emerging agents.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boler, M. (1999). Feeling power: Emotions and education. New York, NY: Routledge.
Boydston, J. (1990). The collected works of John Dewey: Early, middle and late works. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Curley, E. (Ed.) (1996). Spinoza’s ethics. London: Penguin Books.
Curtis, M. (1991). Walter Lippmann reconsidered. Society,28, 23–31.
Festenstein, M. (2001). Inquiry as critique. Political Studies,49, 730–748.
Fletcher, N. M. (2014). Body talk, body taunt: Corporeal dialogue within a community of philosophical inquiry. Analytic Teaching and Philosophical Praxis,35(2), 10–25.
Fletcher, N. M. (2016). Negotiating the pseudo-environments of childhood. In D. Kennedy & B. Bahler (Eds.), Philosophy of childhood today: Exploring the boundaries. Landham, MD: Lexington.
Fletcher, N. M., & Oyler, J. M. (2016). Aspirational eros: Curating an aesthetic space for argumentation. In M. Gregory, J. Haynes, & K. Murris (Eds.), Routledge international handbook on philosophy for children. New York, NY: Routledge.
Friedman, M. (2003). Autonomy, gender, politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gregg, M., & Seigworth, G. J. (Eds.) (2010). The affect theory reader. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
Gregory, M. (2007). Normative dialogue types in philosophy for children. Gifted Education International,22(1), 160–171.
Gregory, M. (2008). Philosophy for children: Practitioner handbook. Montclair, NJ: Institute for the Advancement of Philosophy for Children.
Gregory, M. (2011). A framework for facilitating classroom dialogue. Presentation at the Annual Summer Seminar. Mendham, NJ: Institute for the Advancement of Philosophy for Children.
Kennedy, D. (2010). Philosophical dialogue with children: Essays on theory and practice. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press.
Lee, K. J. (1986). Doing Mark in a juvenile correctional facility. Thinking: The Journal of Philosophy for Children,6(3), 9–16.
Lenoir, F. (2016). Philosopher et méditer avec les enfants. Paris: Michel Albin.
Lipman, M. (1988). Philosophy goes to school. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Lipman, M. (1996). Natasha: Vygotskian dialogues. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Lipman, M. (2003). Thinking in education. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Lippmann, W. (1922). Public opinion. New York, NY: Brace and Company.
Mackenzie, C., & Stoljar, N. (Eds.) (2000). Relational autonomy: Perspectives on autonomy, agency and the social self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peirce, C. S. (1997). The fixation of belief. In L. Menand (Ed.), Pragmatism: A reader. New York, NY: Vintage.
Sharp, A. M. (1993). Peirce, feminism, and philosophy for children. Analytic Teaching,14(1), 51–62.
Sharp, A. M. (1997). The aesthetic dimension of the community of inquiry. Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines,17(1), 67–77.
Splitter, L., & Sharp, A. M. (1995). Teaching for better thinking. Sydney: Australian Council for Educational Research.
Wright, B. (1973). Five public philosophies of Walter Lippmann. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
About this article
Cite this article
Fletcher, N.M. Destabilizing stereotyped concepts in childhood: Some opportunities and risks of philosophy for children as an aid to PVE. Prospects 48, 61–78 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-019-09446-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-019-09446-0