Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Health Services Research and Regionalization of Care—From Policy to Practice: the Ontario Experience in Head and Neck Cancer

  • Head and Neck Cancers (EY Hanna, Section Editor)
  • Published:
Current Oncology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Patients being treated at higher case volume hospitals or by higher case volume physicians appear to have better outcomes. This volume–outcome relationship is reviewed for oncologic and non-oncologic surgery with a focus on head and neck oncology. The impact of these research findings on health policy and health-care organization in Ontario, Canada, is then outlined. Lastly, future directions for quality improvement in surgical oncology are reviewed in the context of a universal health-care system. These include surgeon report cards, pre-operative checklists, linking funding and remuneration to the quality of delivered care, and the use of process improvement techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: •• Of major importance

  1. Berwick DM. A user’s manual for the IOM’s ‘Quality Chasm’ report. Health Aff (Millwood). 2002;21(3):80–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Institute of Medicine. Crossing the Quality Chasm: a new health system for the twenty-first century. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Milbank Mem Fund Q. 1966;44(3):166–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB, Birkmeyer NJ. Measuring the quality of surgical care: structure, process, or outcomes? J Am Coll Surg. 2004;198(4):626–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Birkmeyer JD, Siewers AE, Finlayson EV, Stukel TA, Lucas FL, Batista I, et al. Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2002;346(15):1128–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(22):2117–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Simunovic M, Rempel E, Theriault ME, Coates A, Whelan T, Holowaty E, et al. Influence of hospital characteristics on operative death and survival of patients after major cancer surgery in Ontario. Can J Surg. 2006;49(4):251–8.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Urbach DR, Bell CM, Austin PC. Differences in operative mortality between high- and low-volume hospitals in Ontario for 5 major surgical procedures: estimating the number of lives potentially saved through regionalization. CMAJ. 2003;168(11):1409–14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Urbach DR, Stukel TA, Croxford R, MacCallum NL. Analysis of current research related to the impact of low-volume procedures/surgery and care on outcomes of care. 2005.

  10. Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Complications, failure to rescue, and mortality with major inpatient surgery in medicare patients. Ann Surg. 2009;250(6):1029–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ghaferi AA, Osborne NH, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Hospital characteristics associated with failure to rescue from complications after pancreatectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 2010;211(3):325–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Ghaferi AA, Birkmeyer JD, Dimick JB. Hospital volume and failure to rescue with high-risk surgery. Med Care. 2011;49(12):1076–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghaferi AA, Dimick JB. Variation in mortality after high-risk cancer surgery: failure to rescue. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2012;21(3):389. 95, vii.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Sobol JB, Wunsch H. Triage of high-risk surgical patients for intensive care. Crit Care. 2011;15(2):217.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Birkmeyer JD, Lucas FL, Wennberg DE. Potential benefits of regionalizing major surgery in Medicare patients. Eff Clin Pract. 1999;2(6):277–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Birkmeyer JD, Finlayson EV, Birkmeyer CM. Volume standards for high-risk surgical procedures: potential benefits of the Leapfrog initiative. Surgery. 2001;130(3):415–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dudley RA, Johansen KL, Brand R, Rennie DJ, Milstein A. Selective referral to high-volume hospitals: estimating potentially avoidable deaths. JAMA. 2000;283(9):1159–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Eskander A, Merdad M, Irish JC, Hall SF, Groome PA, Freeman JL, et al. Volume-outcome associations in head and neck cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Head Neck. 2014;36(12):1820–34. Systematic review of the literature for volume-outcome associations in head and neck cancer. This study was not limited to surgeons and included radiation oncologists. It was not limited to one subsite or a particular outcome. Lastly, a thorough critique of the methods used makes this article useful.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Eskander A, Irish J, Groome PA, Freeman J, Gullane P, Gilbert R, et al. Volume-outcome relationships for head and neck cancer surgery in a universal health care system. Laryngoscope. 2014;124(9):2081–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gilbert R, Devries-Aboud M, Winquist E, Waldron J, McQuestion M, Head and Neck Disease Site Group. The management of head and neck cancer in Ontario. 2009. Report No.: 5-3.

  21. Eskander A, Irish J, Gullane P, Gilbert R, de Almeida JR, Freeman J, et al. Overview of surgery for oral cavity cancer in Ontario. Head Neck. 2015.

  22. The Healthcare Quality Improvement Partnership (HQIP). National Head and Neck Cancer Audit 2013. Audit. Leeds: Health and Social Care Information Centre (HSCIC); 2014. A modern and recent review of adherence to key processes of care in the management of head and neck cancer in England. Includes detailed information on a wide set of processes of care and is the best study to date addressing adherence to guidelines in head and neck oncology.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hessel AC, Moreno MA, Hanna EY, Roberts DB, Lewin JS, El-Naggar AK, et al. Compliance with quality assurance measures in patients treated for early oral tongue cancer. Cancer. 2010;116(14):3408–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lewis CM, Weber RS, Hanna EY. Quality of care in head and neck cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2011;13(2):120–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gourin CG, Starmer HM, Herbert RJ, Frick KD, Forastiere AA, Quon H, et al. Quality of care and short- and long-term outcomes of laryngeal cancer care in the elderly. Laryngoscope. 2015;125(10):2323–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Eskander A, Monteiro E, Irish JC, Gullane P, Gilbert R, de Almeida JR, et al. Adherence to guideline-recommended process measures for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck in Ontario: impact of surgeon and hospital volume. Head Neck. 2016. doi:10.1002/hed.24364.

  27. Finley CJ, Bendzsak A, Tomlinson G, Keshavjee S, Urbach DR, Darling GE. The effect of regionalization on outcome in pulmonary lobectomy: a Canadian national study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140(4):757–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Simunovic M, Urbach D, Major D, Sutradhar R, Baxter N, To T, et al. Assessing the volume-outcome hypothesis and region-level quality improvement interventions: pancreas cancer surgery in two Canadian provinces. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(10):2537–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Haynes AB, Weiser TG, Berry WR, Lipsitz SR, Breizat AH, Dellinger EP, et al. A surgical safety checklist to reduce morbidity and mortality in a global population. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(5):491–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Wenger E, McDermott RA, Snyder W. Cultivating Communities of Practice: a guide to managing knowledge. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press; 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Eskander A, Irish J, Freeman J, Gullane P, Gilbert R, Groome PA, et al. Overview of major salivary gland cancer surgery in Ontario (2003–2010). J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;43(1):50.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Gourin CG, Forastiere AA, Sanguineti G, Koch WM, Marur S, Bristow RE. Impact of surgeon and hospital volume on short-term outcomes and cost of laryngeal cancer surgical care. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(1):85–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gourin CG, Forastiere AA, Sanguineti G, Marur S, Koch WM, Bristow RE. Impact of surgeon and hospital volume on short-term outcomes and cost of oropharyngeal cancer surgical care. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(4):746–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Gourin CG, Frick KD. National trends in laryngeal cancer surgery and the effect of surgeon and hospital volume on short-term outcomes and cost of care. Laryngoscope. 2012;122(1):88–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gourin CG, Frick KD. National trends in oropharyngeal cancer surgery and the effect of surgeon and hospital volume on short-term outcomes and cost of care. Laryngoscope. 2012;122(3):543–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Gourin CG, Forastiere AA, Sanguineti G, Marur S, Koch WM, Bristow RE. Volume-based trends in laryngeal cancer surgery. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(1):77–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gourin CG, Forastiere AA, Sanguineti G, Marur S, Koch WM, Bristow RE. Volume-based trends in surgical care of patients with oropharyngeal cancer. Laryngoscope. 2011;121(4):738–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan C. Irish.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

Antoine Eskander, David P. Goldstein, and Jonathan C. Irish declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Financial Support

Dr. Antoine Eskander performed research which was supported by a funding from the Chapnik, Freeman and Friedberg Surgeon Scientist Award, the Temmy Latner/Dynacare Chair in Head and Neck Oncology Fund at Mount Sinai Hospital, the Estey Fund from the Princess Margaret Hospital Foundation, the Kevin and Sandra Sullivan Chair in Surgical Oncology Fund, and Department of Otolaryngology – Head and Neck Surgery at the University Health Network.

Additional information

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Head and Neck Cancers

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Eskander, A., Goldstein, D.P. & Irish, J.C. Health Services Research and Regionalization of Care—From Policy to Practice: the Ontario Experience in Head and Neck Cancer. Curr Oncol Rep 18, 19 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-016-0500-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11912-016-0500-6

Keywords

Navigation