Improving the recognition and management of hemorrhage: A scoping review of nursing and midwifery education

Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Jun:113:105361. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105361. Epub 2022 Apr 6.

Abstract

Background: Hemorrhage is a frequent complication that nurses and midwives must recognize and manage to avoid life-threatening consequences for patients. There is currently no synthesis of evidence on educational interventions in nursing and midwifery regarding hemorrhage, thus limiting the definition of best practices.

Objective: To map the literature on nursing and midwifery education regarding the recognition and management of hemorrhage.

Design: Scoping review based on the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines.

Data sources: Quantitative studies evaluating the effect of educational interventions with students, nurses, or midwives published in English or French, with no time limit.

Review methods: Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment were conducted by two independent reviewers. We characterized educational interventions based on the Guideline for Reporting Evidence-Based Practice Educational Interventions and Teaching. We categorized learning outcomes using the New World Kirkpatrick Model. Methodological quality appraisal was performed with tools from the Joanna Briggs Institute. Findings were synthesized using descriptive statistics and graphical methods RESULT: Most of the 38 studies used a single-group design (n = 26, 68%) and were conducted with professionals (n = 28, 74%) in hospital settings (n = 20, 53%). Most were of low (n = 14; 37%) or moderate (n = 18, 47%) methodological quality. Most interventions focused on postpartum hemorrhage (n = 34, 89%) and combined two or more teaching strategies (n = 25, 66%), often pairing an informational segment (e.g., lecture, readings) with a practical session (e.g., workshop, simulation). Learning outcomes related to the management (n = 27; 71%) and recognition of hemorrhage (n = 19, 50%), as well as results for patients and organizations (n = 9, 24%).

Conclusion: Considerable heterogeneity in interventions and learning outcomes precluded conducting a systematic review of effectiveness. High-quality, controlled studies are needed, particularly in surgery and trauma. Reflection on the contribution of nurses and midwives to the detection, monitoring, and management of hemorrhage could enrich the content and expected outcomes of hemorrhage education.

Keywords: Clinical decision-making; Clinical reasoning; Education; Hemorrhage; Interprofessional education; Midwifery; Nursing; Postpartum hemorrhage; Scoping review; Systematic review.

Publication types

  • Review
  • Systematic Review

MeSH terms

  • Clinical Competence
  • Educational Status
  • Female
  • Hemorrhage / therapy
  • Humans
  • Learning
  • Midwifery*
  • Pregnancy