ijerph-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Non-standard Forms of Employment as Social Determinants of Health and Health Inequalities

A special issue of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (ISSN 1660-4601). This special issue belongs to the section "Occupational Safety and Health".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (4 September 2023) | Viewed by 3819

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Unit of Occupational Medicine, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 11365 Stockholm, Sweden
Interests: digitalization of the labour market and its impact on health, trajectories of precarious employment as determinants of health and health inequalities, mixed-methods research

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. MAP Centre for Urban Health Solutions, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON M5B 1W8, Canada
2. Unit of Occupational Medicine, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 11365 Stockholm, Sweden
Interests: health consequences of non-standard employment arrangements; impact of public policies on health human resources; impact of systemic factors on population health and health inequities

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Section of Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, 2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
2. Unit of Occupational Medicine, Institute of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, 11365 Stockholm, Sweden
Interests: social and behavioral determinants of health, with a focus on how the rise of new forms of employment results in health inequalities especially among vulnerable groups in the labor market

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Non-standard forms of employment, defined as employment arrangements that differ from standard employment, have increased in recent years. Some examples of non-standard forms of employment include temporary employment, part-time and on-call work, multiparty employment relationships (e.g., temporary agency work), dependent self-employment, and home-based and remote work. While such forms of employment have allowed more workers to integrate into the labour market, they could pose considerable challenges for the employment quality, occupational safety and health regulations, work environment, and health and well-being of workers.

Potential topics for this Special Issue include, but are not limited to the following:

  • Trends in non-standard forms of employment and related health outcomes;
  • Understudied non-standard forms employment, such as digital labour platform work, dependent self-employment, and remote or home-based work and their relationship with health and well-being;
  • Challenges posed by non-standard forms of employment in the application of labour and occupational safety and health law;
  • Drivers of non-standard forms of employment and their relationship with health and well-being;
  • Mechanisms through which non-standard forms of employment affect health;
  • Differential health effects of non-standard forms of employment according to axes of inequality such as gender, age, education, social class, ethnicity, or immigration status;
  • Long-term and cumulative effects on workers of non-standard forms of employment; differences and similarities of non-standard forms of employment based on occupation, sector, and geographical location;
  • Interventions, regulations, and policies aimed at improving the employment security, income adequacy, and occupational safety and health of workers in non-standard employment arrangements.

Dr. Nuria Matilla-Santander
Dr. Virginia Gunn
Dr. Bertina Kreshpaj
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2500 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • employment conditions
  • occupational health and safety
  • health equity
  • new world of work
  • decent work
  • social determinants of health

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

13 pages, 404 KiB  
Article
Gender Differences in the Indirect Effect of Psychosocial Work Environment in the Association of Precarious Employment and Chronic Stress: A Cross-Sectional Mediation Analysis
by Fabrizio Méndez-Rivero, Óscar J. Pozo and Mireia Julià
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(23), 16073; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph192316073 - 1 Dec 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1598
Abstract
Gender differences in the association between precarious employment and chronic stress have been found but the mechanisms underlying this relationship have not been explored. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the mediating effects of psychosocial risk factors at work (i.e., [...] Read more.
Gender differences in the association between precarious employment and chronic stress have been found but the mechanisms underlying this relationship have not been explored. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the mediating effects of psychosocial risk factors at work (i.e., demands, control, and support) and work–life conflicts in the relationship between precarious employment and chronic stress as measured through the production of steroid hormones (both adrenal and gonadal) for men and women separately. Cross-sectional data were derived from a sample of workers from Barcelona (n = 125–255 men; 130 women). A set of 23 markers were determined from hair samples to evaluate the production of both adrenal and gonadal steroids. Decomposition analyses were applied to estimate the indirect effects of psychosocial risk factors and work–life conflict using linear regression models. Gender differences in the association between precarious employment and steroids production were confirmed. Psychosocial risk factors and work–life conflicts had indirect effects only among women (βCortisol = 0.18; 95% CI: 0.04–0.32; βCortisol/Cortisone 0.19; 95% CI: 0.08–0.31; β%Cortisol 0.12; 95% CI: 0.05–0.20). Gender differences suggest that the physiological response to precarious employment could be determined by the social construction of gender identities, as well as by positions and roles in the labour market and family. Future studies should delve further into these differences to improve employment and working policies, thus mitigating gender inequalities in the labour market to prevent work-related stress. Full article
13 pages, 1349 KiB  
Article
Trends in Precarious Employment in Sweden 1992–2017: A Social Determinant of Health
by Theo Bodin, Nuria Matilla-Santander, Jenny Selander, Per Gustavsson, Tomas Hemmingsson, Gun Johansson, Johanna Jonsson, Katarina Kjellberg, Bertina Kreshpaj, Cecilia Orellana, Eskil Wadensjö and Maria Albin
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(19), 12797; https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912797 - 6 Oct 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1570
Abstract
The aim of this study was to identify trends in precarious employment in the Swedish workforce from 1992 to 2017. This is a repeated cross-sectional study, analyzing the total working population aged 16–75 in Sweden at five-year intervals. We used version 2.0 of [...] Read more.
The aim of this study was to identify trends in precarious employment in the Swedish workforce from 1992 to 2017. This is a repeated cross-sectional study, analyzing the total working population aged 16–75 in Sweden at five-year intervals. We used version 2.0 of the Swedish Register-based Operationalization of Precarious Employment, covering the following dimensions: employment insecurity, income inadequacy, lack of rights and protection. The proportion in precarious employment increased from 9.7 to 12% between 1992 and 2017, a relative increase of 24%. The prevalence was higher among those of lower age, of low education, and immigrants. Differences between sexes converged, and there were slightly more precarious men than women in 2017. The relative increase was most pronounced among men, especially those with low educational attainment and of European origin. The increasing proportion of precarious employees is a clear challenge to the tripartite Nordic model, which requires sufficient trade-union bargaining power. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop